What about Linda Moulton Howe?

[unipax]

What about Linda Moulton Howe?

I have always felt that she is one to trust, as in an honest reporter.

Just wondering what anyone else thinks or knows about her.

She was on radio the other nite, and took a call from a guy in Puyallup who saw a ufo. She mentioned that Tacoma -- Seattle is one of the hottest ufo areas in N America.

One of her callers said he saw a one thousand foot diameter craft. He asked her if it could be one of 'ours'. She said that if it is that big, it is not 'ours' ....
I wondered about that. Why couldnt one that big be 'ours' ?

Also, a caller asked her why the govts have not come clean yet. Her answer was that it would cause chaos among the religions.
What does she know that she is not saying?

I wondered if Norval & Gale have talked to her.
Did they?
Should they? Would they?

[unipax]

Also she said that the original 1960 film "The Day the Earth Stood Still"
was 100% a CIA production.

[Swami Salami]

If she wasn't "hiding" behind paying sites she would be more believeable.......

[unipax]

Well her site was free for years, until a year or two ago I think it was she started charging.


Sometimes it is just a money grab but I think that in some cases, charging for access is justifiable, maybe to help with expenses (which usually is the reason given. ) I have not subscribed to any so far.

[Gary]

We have been intouch a couple of times, through e-mails, I grab loads of her stuff for my blog, I think she is good!
But then again I think most things are good because I'm a bit naive!

[Gale]

No, No, No and No
Also, I disagree with charging people to access information.

[Gary]

Hahahah! Well we agree on one thing then!

link (http://gazbom.blogspot.com/2008/12/edward-van-ulft-hugh-mcgonigle-alec.html)

[unipax]

No, No, No and No
Also, I disagree with charging people to access information.

I know what you mean, but what about books?
Before internet I bought books to get this kind of info

[unipax]

No, No, No and No
Also, I disagree with charging people to access information.

Are you saying that you think she is unreliable, or a disinfo artist, or what is your opinion of her ?

I ask because I have not detected any 'red flags' around her work, but I'd want to know if I am wrong.

[Norval]

Linda Moulton Howe
There are a few of the investigators that have taken a personal interest in what they are investigating, I think she is one of those. I hope she at least makes a good living at what she does, just like Bill and Kerry of PAC. A worker is worthy of their wages. On the other hand if they are involved intentionally in the misdirection and misinformation work, may they get laryngitis and their fingers hurt for typing. :)

[unipax]

Intriguing remark ......


Linda Moulton Howe
There are a few of the investigators that have taken a personal interest in what they are investigating, I think she is one of those.

......... you have me wondering what you mean by this. Can you elaborate?

[Norval]

I think she is one of those that have taken a personal interest in what they are investigating, unlike Bill and Keery.

[unipax]

hang on
.................................................. ...............................

[unipax]

dang
.................................................. ...........................

[unipax]

OK. Example:
I feel that my interest in this study is personal. Strictly so, pretty much. I cannot think of any other motive. Except I sometimes want others to see what I see, and that is only because I think that would be for the best for all.

Possibly, as I now ponder on it, Bill's & Kerry's interest would be extra-personal, as in one or more possible areas including commercial or political or even artistic. Those describe some type of personal gain, but artistic being benign, I think.

So at this point I'm taking it that you'd describe your interest as personal, or do I misunderstand? I'm still trying to understand whether you think MLH is trustworthy.

That is because as I said, I so far get that she is OK, and I would like to know your perspective. Having said that, I recognize how skillfully I have been misled before. I guess that for some reason I'm hoping it aint so in her case, cuz she's always seemed straightforward to me.

On the other hand, it has always been ultimately a good thing when I see that I have been disinformed / misled.

It aint the fifties no more.

[Norval]

OK. Example:
I feel that my interest in this study is personal. Strictly so, pretty much. I cannot think of any other motive. Except I sometimes want others to see what I see, and that is only because I think that would be for the best for all.

So at this point I'm taking it that you'd describe your interest as personal, or do I misunderstand? I'm still trying to understand whether you think MLH is trustworthy.

That is because as I said, I so far get that she is OK, and I would like to know your perspective. Having said that, I recognize how skillfully I have been misled before. I guess that for some reason I'm hoping it aint so in her case, cuz she's always seemed straightforward to me.

On the other hand, it has always been ultimately a good thing when I see that I have been disinformed / misled.

It aint the fifties no more.

Linda Moulton Howe
Yes, it is "personal" with me too, yet it has now become more than that. LMH is a "reporter", hopefully of the facts, but we must test out the "facts" as best we can. She has done some good reporting and investigative research that is for sure.

Yes, we are to learn from the deceptions and lies that have tripped us up over the years. Who can we trust? My honest answer to that is to "trust as you must". My "base line" or "BS measurement device" is the Document.

[unipax]

cool
thnx
............................................