Worst warming impacts avoidable if ...

[₣яэđĸĊ]

I found this today at:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30214341/


Study: Worst warming impacts avoidable if ...
Hope seen with 70 percent emissions cut, catastrophe under 'as is' scenario

WASHINGTON - So what would the world's temperatures, and the planet, look like in 2100 if greenhouse gas emissions continued as is? And if they were cut by 70 percent?

Researchers at a well-known climate center asked those questions and used a computer model to conclude that it'd be catastrophic if unchecked, but manageable if the world could reduce gases by that much.

"This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century," Warren Washington, the study's lead author, said in a statement. "But if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change and avoid catastrophe."

Other projections if emissions were cut by 70 percent:
Sea level rise due to thermal expansion from warming waters would be about 5.5 inches instead of 8.7 inches. But either scenario still projects significant sea level rise from melting ice sheets and glaciers.
Arctic summer sea ice would shrink by about a quarter and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three-quarters and continuing to melt.
Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half, helping preserve fisheries, sea birds, polar bears and other wildlife.
Significant regional changes in precipitation would be cut in half. The U.S. Southwest would not be as dry, and the U.S. Northeast and Canada would not see as much rain as under an unchecked scenario.
The climate system would stabilize by about 2100, instead of continuing to warm.

OK Then...
Told ya that story to ask you this'n...

The last I read, Mars is heating up at the same rate as earth. This is because it is THE SUN that is heating up, not earth!

Unless there is some VAST infrastructure on Mars, and I mean, as big as that of the entire planet Earth, how is it that Mars' temperature, tho farther away, is keeping up with earth ?

How will banning my Mustang, and my BMW (not to mention dealing with the wife and her pick up truck), leaving me sitting behind some farting horse in a cart stop global warming?

My dumb questions for the day.

[sokpuppet]

How will banning my Mustang, and my BMW (not to mention dealing with the wife and her pick up truck), leaving me sitting behind some farting horse in a cart stop global warming?

My dumb questions for the day.


(tong firmly in cheek)

Stopping your Mustang, BM and pickup rides will contribute to your helplessness. This in turn will contribute to eveyone elses. That will lead to fully global government. That will lead to unrestrained eugenics programs worldwide. That will reduce the human poulation to 20% of current. That will fulfill he agreement with the BETs. Then they will turn-off the technology that is doing this.

Seriously, I havn't got a clue. The 'evidence' seems to suggest that a galactic phenomena is at work here. I wish we could really nail, once and for all, if we really are at the point of crossing a galactic central line. If we are, I reckon that the fact that galaxies are the only things out there that are FLAT, indicates that 'something' significant is present at the central line.

It might just (huh) be that when we cross the line, the magnetic polarities reverse. Whatever, something makes galaxies flat, and that something is almost bound to be present at the central line zone.

As for "global warming", well, don't they always jump on bandwagons to push their games. I hear, via Alex Jones, that Al Gore and Barak Obama are both heavily invested in carbon trading companies. (duugh)

[unipax]

yeah, ditto what Fred & Sok said

[Norval]

Sokpuppet, you may want to study galaxies a bit more. :)

[sokpuppet]

norval, what do mean? .........

[Norval]

most are not flat, , , , , , , , , :)

[unipax]

If spiral and viewed on edge, arent they generally sorta flat with a bulge in the middle ?

[Norval]

When it comes to "global warming" I am still undecided just how much of the truth we have. There is another aspect of this that most haven't even considered. Our planet is being cared for by good ETs with alot more tech know how then we have as yet. Is there a problem for real, or are we just seeing some alterations being done to our planet intentionally by good ETs?

The link below is to a great archive of pictures of "out there". Lots of galaxy pics.
Or, do a search of their data base of pics for what you want to see.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html

[zorgon]

I can't believe people are still buying the greenhouse gases thingy...

Just wait till Yellowstone pops its cork... then talk to me about greenhouse gases.

Keep the Mustang... put in the high octane stuff...

Cow poop puts out more pollutants than your Mustang... and if we ban cows we won't eat anymore... which would make less gases from THAT end

[₣яэđĸĊ]

Zorgon, hope this gladdens yer heart ;)

A few years back, some idiot with an idea decided that New Zealand needed to start taxing all their ranchers for the amount of methane their livestock expelled (no shit, I ain'ta kiddin'). This inspired the following political cartoon. I hereby make you a present of a copy I saved.;)

[Gale]

I can't believe people are still buying the greenhouse gases thingy...

:dito:


Is there a problem for real, or are we just seeing some alterations being done to our planet intentionally by good ETs?

I chose both.
There is a biologic that cleans up oil spills, this would be part of the "healing itself" mechanisms that are already in place.
From looking into the government sponsored research rabbit hole, it is very evident they are interested in the increase in ice crystals in our atmosphere that has been happening over the last decade. Which accounts for why the sea levels have not raised with the polar ice cap melt.

The drastic change in life span after the flood should be a red flag. The moisture layer around the Earth would have protected and filtered out the harmful solar rays. Note the angel with the fourth vial in Revelations.

There has even been investigation into the possibility that our Sol System is not part of the Milky Way but of another galaxy that has collided with and is amalgamating together with the Milky Way which could possibly account for the Solar System wide heating up of the planets and moons.

As for good ET's doing alterations, logically after the flood the Earth would have gone through adjustment then "heal itself" mode but this would not account for the acceleration over the last decade. I lean towards intervention as the most plausible explanation.

[zorgon]

Which accounts for why the sea levels have not raised with the polar ice cap melt.

That... or the fact that when Ice melts two things happen...

A) The water from the melting ice fills the hole that the ice occupied...

B) Ice is the one substance that expands when it becomes solid... so Ice takes up more volume that the water it is made from. So if all the sea ice melts it would actually decrease sea levels. (this does not take into account the land ice in Antarctic and Greenland but the volume of that spread over the Earth would not make a huge increase, and some of that will fill the void left by the sea ice.

So it begs the question...

What happened to all the water after the flood? Since it did not return to make permanent cloud cover... where did it go? Just calculate how much volume of water we are talking to cover the highest mountain on Earth, remebering that for every 100 feet you go up, the circumference, thus the volume needed, increases exponentially.

So where did the water go?

[zorgon]

LOVE THEM COWS Thanks

Message to short? LOL

Hmmm maybe that explains Cow Abductions... they are merely floating off under their own power... then when they get high enough they explode and you find cattle mutalations...

Hehehe

[Gale]

Originally Posted by zorgon
So where did the water go?

Wouldn't some of the water have settled down into the crevices or even down into some of the lower levels in the crust?

[Norval]

What is the average amount of water being held in earth's atmosphere at any given time?
That question needs to be answered first.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_water_vapour_exists_within_the_earth's_at mosphere
Answer
12,900 water vapor in the air.
Any idea what units 12,900 represents? :lol:
Another answer I found was this;
Water vapor varies from nearly zero up to about 4% (100% humidity at 120°F, 1 atm) and averages about 0.8%.

As Gale mentions, besides what the Document states about the waters above and under the earth, underground reservoirs. Also, not to forget that the earth's continents have changed according to the Document.

[Heretic]

well - when all of the ice melts in my glass of ice tea, my cup does not runneth over

and I cant really swallow the idea that there is THAT much displacement at the poles to effect the globe in such a manner

my two cents

[Gale]

As for good ET's doing alterations, logically after the flood the Earth would have gone through adjustment then "heal itself" mode but this would not account for the acceleration over the last decade. I lean towards intervention as the most plausible explanation.

Did I forget to mention that the flood was a deliberate change in our environment at that time by ET? So all the science research evidence of the flood across all continents would be more evidence of the ET intervention. That catastrophe was meant to kill off all humanity except a handful of survivors, to kill off the half breeds and would have destroyed the technology developed by society at that time.
The rainbows would not have been seen until then. Now we are starting to see an iridescence in our atmosphere.




Logically, if there was an ice crystal barrier high up in our atmosphere filtering out harmful effects that the surface temperature would be more even globally. I think that would be a good thing. Star gazing might be hampered, but there is technology like satellite imaging.

[Gale]

New words for me "derecho weather"





Seems there maybe three types of derechos.
anvilhead's WunderBlog (http://www.wunderground.com/blog/anvilhead/comment.html?entrynum=40&tstamp=200701)