Project Camelot interviews Dr Steven Greer

[Gale]

Following the Barcelona Exopolitics Summit in July 2009, Kerry and Bill interviewed Steven Greer of the Disclosure Project.

Greer is advocating there are no bad or evil aliens and Kerry, someone should swat her hand.....

[Norval]

Watching this video sure explains alot about why these disclosure projects will never really happen. That guy is a perfect example of a bet in control of the situation. No truth, just lies and deceptions and twisters of words. Thanks Greer, we needed another good example. Now, maybe, Bill and Keery will get the idea of what we were trying to warn everyone about, , , but I doubt it.

[sfth13]

well now i'n confused ,,not insane i hope. lol but if Greer is controlled by the BET's I think that they should say there were bad ET's so the sheeple will take arms when the king returns.. or maybe i'm still missing the point:confused1:

[Gale]

Information acquisition and control.
Control key positions, you control and manipulate the information flow. You can also polarize two or more group with the same objective, divide and conquer.
So from either group's perspective an incoming armada would be perceived as not a good thing. With one major difference, Greer's perspective would be more dangerous causing more shock to those thinking an armada of visitors would be diplomatic.
We know when King Jesus returns, He is coming with an attitude. He will not play any diplomatic games, either the people are one of His or they're not. No one is going to stare Him down to take Greer's lion example.
If Greer is convincing in his argument that there are no bad or evil et's, they will all be approachable by some means or another; his argument will have the hardest ripple effect when determined the opposite is correct.
Whereas Bill & Kerry already have a foothold on a very simplistic good and bad model, they are just getting confused with all the smooth talking players.

[sfth13]

AH HA!! Thanks Gale now I see.. they just keep confusing everyone so most won't know what to do or believe...I keep trying to wake up a few close friends and family but they won't even look at any of the info or reasearch it themselves.. they just think i'm nuts..

[Bobbi]

Same here, Mighty Mouse. My kids think I'm crazy, too, but my dad understands and that was a surprise to me. I think a lot of it has to do with our, and older, generations. The older you are, the more obvious the technological achievements over our lifetime. Hell, I remember using an icebox and an ice pick. Now they have refrigerators that spit the ice out for your drinks.

[Norval]

Most that know me don't think I am crazy, most just don't want to think about the things I think about. Most say that I scare the hell out of them. Why? Because I can show them the evidence of why I believe the things I do. Most don't want to have their little worlds turned upside down. They have a false sense of security and they are comfortable in them. Most don't want to admit they believe what I say because it will upset their friends, loved ones, and family.

It is not my intent to upset anyone's life, but if the truth does that, then blame the god damned ones that deceived us all in the first place. Deception breeds confusion, confusion breeds insanity, and insanity is the mess this world is now in. I have confidence that what I have learned and shown others is the truth of the situation of the world in which we were born. Confidence based on facts and knowledge, not feelings.

[unipax]

Re that Greer interview from July (thnx Gale)...

* according to Camelot and according to all Greer has said, Greer is apparently promoting 'all his ET contacts' as harmless (to his knowledge, supposedly).

* meanwhile, the bets in general are conditioning the sheeple to mistake the good guys for bad guys


Since those two are contradictory, I wonder which specific angle Greer is playing.

Maybe his influence over his audience will ensure the world sees a display of an engineered strain of disagreement when the time comes.

Or maybe his job is to wrangle those who for whichever reasons can accept 'friendly et' but wont see / accept a returning King.

That would make him a type of 'controlled opposition' agent.
Maybe that is his angle.

[Norval]

Obviously Greer's angle is misinformation and disinformation along with misdirection. Greer's ET contacts would, of course, all be here on earth, the losers, so go figure. One does not contradict the other.

[unipax]

Obviously Greer's angle is misinformation and disinformation along with misdirection.

Isnt that the job description of a Controlled Opposition agent ?


Greer's ET contacts would, of course, all be here on earth, the losers, so go figure. One does not contradict the other.
Yesterday 03:18 PM

That is true for those with eyes to see through the disinfo.
I'm not defending Greer, in case it seemed so.

Whats with Bill and Kerry anyhow?
On one hand they seem to expose Greer's disinfo in that his disinfo may endanger people who are believing the other disinfo which conditions people to mistake the returning King for a bad guy.

But on the other hand, they continue to distribute other strains of disinfo from their various infested interviewees.

[Norval]

A Controlled Opposition Agent, , , could be.

Bill and Kerry;
As near as I can tell they sold out their forum members and were probably threatened if they didn't go along with what they were told to do and in what direction to go with what they are doing. They seem convinced that they have the real story about what is going on in the world when it comes to UFOs ETs and Spirituality. Go figure. :lol: Mostly they seem to be trying to cash in and make some money on what they are doing.

[unipax]

A Controlled Opposition Agent, , , could be.

Well, if Greer is in the camp of BETs....and at the same time he is giving his audience the impression that there are no BETs.................

That describes a role (among other roles) which would be assigned to a Controlled Opposition agent, as I understand it.

Bill and Kerry seemingly exposed that. Are they now merely bumbling pawns on a leash ?

Perhaps more specifically Greer is a Gatekeeper. As I understand it, a Gatekeeper is one who is positioned to misdirect those who are in search of the bad guy, or in search of the good guy, for that matter.

The Gatekeeper is doing his job as long as they direct the searcher away from the truth or whatever it is they are looking for.

No doubt Controlled Opposition agents wear numerous hats. Probably therefore on an organizational chart, a Gatekeeper would be a sub-type, listed under Controlled Opposition agents.

Agents provocateur would be another type of Controlled Opposition

[Norval]

Any way yah want to look at it, , , but we try to keep it simple so as not to confuse the issue any more than it already is.

Yes, it's a pyramid structure, with a few renegades also.