Norval
10-20-2009, 10:14 AM
Continuing Crater Research
Lunar Picture Of the Day
http://lpod.wikispaces.com/October+20%2C+2009
Well, it is definitely NOT a Concise Systematic Crater Chain (CSCC).
It is a remarkable image and of which I am grateful to add it to our collection of what CSCCs are NOT.
And, thank you John for the other images link.
http://www.moonposter.ie/feature.htm
http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse/view/M107985155LE
Just one boulder-trail shown from a selection in the latest release from LROC -- see zoomify image (the best boulder-bounce-trails can be seen where the crater slopes meet the floor).
Bottom: The same image with proposed bounce-trace of boulder (very rough). Upto 32 bounce-contacts were counted, however, as some of these contacts may just
be one contact producing a double-looking bounce contact (particularly at the end of the bounce sequence because the boulder is slowing down), the number recorded could be less.
Bottom Inset: Note how the length of the first bounce contact (touch zone length) compares to the original boulder size at rest. The speed and energy of the moving boulder is greater during the first
bounce contact, so it therefore digs in deeper producing a longer touch-zone (following touch zone lengths decrease because speed and energy are slowly being expended).
Image credit: LROC
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/
Lunar Picture Of the Day
http://lpod.wikispaces.com/October+20%2C+2009
Well, it is definitely NOT a Concise Systematic Crater Chain (CSCC).
It is a remarkable image and of which I am grateful to add it to our collection of what CSCCs are NOT.
And, thank you John for the other images link.
http://www.moonposter.ie/feature.htm
http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse/view/M107985155LE
Just one boulder-trail shown from a selection in the latest release from LROC -- see zoomify image (the best boulder-bounce-trails can be seen where the crater slopes meet the floor).
Bottom: The same image with proposed bounce-trace of boulder (very rough). Upto 32 bounce-contacts were counted, however, as some of these contacts may just
be one contact producing a double-looking bounce contact (particularly at the end of the bounce sequence because the boulder is slowing down), the number recorded could be less.
Bottom Inset: Note how the length of the first bounce contact (touch zone length) compares to the original boulder size at rest. The speed and energy of the moving boulder is greater during the first
bounce contact, so it therefore digs in deeper producing a longer touch-zone (following touch zone lengths decrease because speed and energy are slowly being expended).
Image credit: LROC
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/