PDA

View Full Version : Education at it's Finest



Norval
11-25-2009, 06:26 AM
From the emails, , , , ,


NO PARENT LEFT BEHIND

I promise you cannot read these and not laugh out loud.
These are real notes written by parents in the Laredo & United I.S.D.

Spellings have been left intact.


1. My son is under a doctor's care and should not take PE today. Please
execute him.

2. Please exkuce lisa for being absent she was sick and i had her shot.

3. Dear school: please ecsc's john being absent on jan. 28, 29, 30, 31,
32 and also 33.

4. Please excuse gloria from jim today. She is administrating.

5. Please excuse roland from p.e. for a few days. Yesterday he fell out
of a tree and misplaced his hip.

6. John has been absent because he had two teeth taken out of his face.

7. Carlos was absent yesterday because he was playing football. He was
hurt in the growing part.

8. Megan could not come to school today because she has been bothered by
very close veins.

9. Chris will not be in school cus he has an acre in his side.

10. Please excuse ray friday from school. He has very loose vowels.

11. Please excuse Lesli from being absent yesterday. She had diahre
dyrea direathethe (shits).

12. Please excuse tommy for being absent yesterday. He had diarrhea, and
his boots leak.

13. Irving was absent yesterday because he missed his bust.

14. Please excuse jimmy for being. It was his father's fault.

15. I kept Billie home because she had to go Christmas shopping because
i don't know what size she wear.

16. Please excuse jennifer for missing school yesterday. We forgot to
get the sunday paper off the porch, and when we found it monday. We
thought it was sunday.

17. Sally won't be in school a week from friday. We have to attend her
funeral.

18. My daughter was absent yesterday because she was tired. She spent a
weekend with the marines.

19. Please excuse Jason for being absent yesterday. He had a cold and
could not breed well.

20. Please excuse mary for being absent yesterday. She was in bed with
gramps.

21. Gloria was absent yesterday as she was having a gangover.

22. Please excuse brenda. She has been sick and under the doctor.

23. Maryann was absent december 11-16, because she had a fever,
sorethroat, headache and upset stomach. Her sister was also sick, fever
an sore throat, her brother had a low grade fever and ached all over. I
wasn't the best either, sore throat and fever. There must be something
going around, her father even got hot last night.

Now we know why parents are screaming for better education for our kids.

unipax
11-25-2009, 11:35 AM
Dumbing Down worked well.

It's still working.

I recall when I began seeing bad spelling in major advertising and other places where I had never seen it before. It was on a roadside billboard, and all present found it remarkable. We used to be a somewhat educated culture.

Comparison of 10th grade exam from 1890s versus one from 1990s would be a shocker.

Gale
11-26-2009, 06:24 AM
My stepfather used to read the local newspaper cover to cover and marveled at the spelling and grammar errors.
You should examine the school system, they are teaching more topics related to managing personal life. What used to be one class of home economics is now several separate classes teaching cooking, sewing, balancing your check book etc.

Bobbi
11-26-2009, 07:43 AM
It's even more pronounced when you encounter those with college degrees who cannot spell the simplest words - and don't even care.

sfth13
11-26-2009, 07:51 AM
I know I spell a ton of words wrong while typing. writing is no problem, but I have noticed that when i type for some strange reason I the push the key next to the one i want to push... odd. and it's starting to drive me crazy, cause i'll backspace and then hit the wrong key again... i know i've lost my mind but i didn't think it was this bad..:banghead:

Bobbi
11-26-2009, 08:32 AM
Knowing that you misspelled and bothered to change it, tells all. I get to typing so fast at times I will miss a key or add an extra one, but typically a "quick finger" error is obvious just by how it looks. However, when you use the same word multiple times and spell it always the same, that's another thing. Phonics, in my opinion, is the major reason for the lack of proper English.

A few examples: (Keeping in mind there are always a few exception)

A double consonant after a vowel, makes the vowel "short". A single consonant makes the vowel "long".

An "e" at the end of a word will make the preceding vowel "long". In this case, often tense and form of word can be changed and cause confusion. i.e. "run", with a short "u", is a verb, "rune", with a long "u", is a noun.

I'm the first to admit I'm anal about spelling. After so many years in the legal field, as well as having put three children through the pathetic education system, I'm a stickler, annoyingly so. I apologize, but am still dismayed.

sfth13
11-26-2009, 08:41 AM
you don't have to apologize for anything. I was just trying to point out this mental block that seems to be forming and it happens to involve spelling and i'm finding it hard to correct.. I am in total agreement with you on this education system. on occasion i have to read job apps. and i am totally amazed at the missplled words... but i think i might need glasses. lol

unipax
11-26-2009, 02:56 PM
Anybody know when they began the intentional dumbing down of public ed ?

If you havent seen them, the school exams 100 yrs apart are eye opening.

This talk of education reminds me of 'notes from a 1969 lecture'.
Education was one of the areas addressed in a talk outlining 'their' plans for world.

The entire piece can be useful as an eye opener for 'beginners'. I suppose it is not verifiable, and it seems to be linked to a group maybe religious, but the results it predicted in 1988 are pretty much unfolded all around us.

I will paste the part re education and then the other topic headings.
Then I'll put links at bottom if anyone wants the rest.


from an Interview by Randy Engel, Director of the US Coalition for Life, with Dr. Dunegan in 1988.

RE Education:

RESTRUCTURING EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF INDOCTRINATION

Another area of discussion was Education. And one of the things in connection with education that I remember connecting with what he said about religion, was – in addition to changing the Bible – he said that the classics in Literature would be changed. I seem to recall Mark Twain's writings was given as one example. But he said, the casual reader reading a revised version of a classic would never even suspect that there was any change. And, somebody would have to go through word by word to even recognize that any change was made in these classics; the changes would be so subtle. But the changes would be such as to promote the acceptability of the new system.

MORE TIME IN SCHOOLS, BUT THEY "WOULDN'T LEARN ANYTHING."

As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in schools, but in many schools they wouldn't learn anything. They'll learn some things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better areas with better people – their kids will learn more. In the better schools, learning would be accelerated. And this is another time where he said, "We think we can push evolution."

By pushing kids to learn more, he seemed to be suggesting that their brains would evolve, that their offspring would evolve – sort of pushing evolution – where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a younger age. As if this pushing would alter their physiology. Overall, schooling would be prolonged. This meant prolonged through the school year. I'm not sure what he said about a long school day, I do remember he said that school was planned to go all summer, that the summer school vacation would become a thing of the past. Not only for schools, but for other reasons. People would begin to think of vacation times year round, not just in the summer.

For most people, it would take longer to complete their education. To get what originally had been in a bachelor's program would now require advanced degrees and more schooling. So that a lot of school time would be just wasted time. Good schools would become more competitive. I inferred when he said that, that he was including all schools – elementary up through college – but I don't recall whether he said that.

Students would have to decide at a younger age what they would want to study and get onto their track early, if they would qualify. It would be harder to change to another field of study once you get started. Studies would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed. You wouldn't have access to material in other fields, outside your own area of study, without approval. This seem to be more... where he talked about limited access to other fields... I seem to recall that as being more at the college level, high school and college level, perhaps. People would be very specialized in their own area of expertise. But they won't be able to get a broad education and won't be able to understand what is going on overall.

CONTROLLING WHO HAS ACCESS TO INFORMATION

He was already talking about computers in education, and at that time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books that were not directly related to their field of study would have to have a very good reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
SCHOOLS AS THE HUB OF THE COMMUNITY

Another angle was that the schools would become more important in people's overall life. Kids in addition to their academics, would have to get into school activities unless they wanted to feel completely out of it. But spontaneous activities among kids – the thing that came to my mind when I heard this was sandlot football and sandlot baseball teams that we worked up as kids growing up. I said the kids wanting any activities outside of school would be almost forced to get them through the school. There would be few opportunities outside.

Now the pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands, where kids would feel they had to be part of something – one or another athletic club or some school activity – these pressures he recognized would cause some students to burn out. He said, "the smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won't be able to make it. They will then move on to other things."

In this connection, and later on in the connection with drug abuse and alcohol abuse, he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognized that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super-achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable – "expendable" – I guess is the word I want.

Education would be lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There'll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can't keep up anymore, you're too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you get too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal – you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside.

SOME BOOKS WOULD JUST DISAPPEAR FROM THE LIBRARIES

In addition to revising the classics, which I alluded to awhile ago - with revising the Bible, he said, "some books would just disappear from the libraries."

This was in the vein that some books contain information or contain ideas that should not be kept around. And therefore, those books would disappear. I don't remember exactly if he said how this was to be accomplished. But I seem to recall carrying away this idea that this would include thefts. That certain people would be designated to go to certain libraries and pick up certain books and just get rid of them. Not necessarily as a matter of policy – just simply steal it. Further down the line, not everybody will be allowed to own books. And some books NOBODY will be allowed to own.

end

***************
Other headings:

* IS there a power, A force or a group of men organizing and redirecting change?
* "Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now . . ."
* People will have to get used to change – everything will change, constantly
* The REAL and the "STATED" goals
* Population Control
* Permission to have babies
* Redirecting the purpose of sex - sex without reproduction and reproduction without sex
* Sex education as a tool of World Government
* Encouraging homosexuality... Sex, anything goes
* Uthanasia and the "Demise Pill"
* Limiting access to affordable medical care makes eliminating the elderly easier
* Planning the control over medicine
* Elimination of private doctors
* New Difficult to diagnose and untreatable diseases
* Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control.
* Inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination
* Education as a tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and pushing evolution and MUCH, MUCH MORE

*********************

Title and links to all of it:

Shadow Government:
The New Order of the Barbarians

(From an Interview by Randy Engel, Director of the US Coalition for Life, with Dr. Dunegan in 1988.)

http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians1.htm
http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians2.htm
http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians3.htm




Part ONE Editorial Note: This is a transcript of the first of three tapes on the "New Order of Barbarians", referred to on the tapes simply as the "new world system." Tapes one and two, done in 1988, are the reminiscences By Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, of a speech given March 20, 1969 by Dr. Richard Day, an insider of the "Order", whose credentials are given in an interview with Dr. Dunegan on tape three.



Well there that is. Not you guys, but maybe you know others who may find it informative if they are beginning to see that things aint right.

That's why I keep it on file

Norval
11-27-2009, 07:03 AM
, , , , another item you may want to consider.
Just because the bad ETs have advanced technologies does not make them smarter.

As you can see when confronted they are not as smart as most of mankind. Hell, I never finished my tenth year of schooling.
I have a ninth grade education and look what happens when they are confronted. What "if" they have had to dumb down people so they appear smarter or at least somewhat equal to mankind? They obviously have many problems trying to fit in.

Gale
11-27-2009, 12:55 PM
What "if" they have had to dumb down people so they appear smarter or at least somewhat equal to mankind? They obviously have many problems trying to fit in.

:throwkiss::rofl::rolllaugh::rolllaugh::rolllaugh:

unipax
11-27-2009, 01:46 PM
that too

the dumbing down that has been perpetrated is sad, sickening, and it has effectively disempowered large segments of humanity, as for voting as just one example. That of course is one purpose of the institutionalized dumbing down agenda.

Geopolitics is important. There is a video of a guy on a street holding a world map, and asking people to find countries on his map. Sad results. Then he labeled australia and tasmania as N & S Korea and asked people to find S korea.

Some guy searched and said "oh there it is, wow I didnt realize S korea was so small"

Gale
11-27-2009, 06:56 PM
The incompetency syndrome (curse so they will believe the lie) is at the root of it all, I think. The amazing part is the individuals stricken with the incompetency syndrome can't fight it.
It is phenomenal!

unipax
11-28-2009, 11:04 AM
Yes, and thanks for telling me about that btw. It is amazing!!!

...and it dont help a bit when key subjects are simply not taught...removed from curriculum.

A high school course called 'civics' taught me about how govt works. It has disappeared from where I attended. I recall early PBS (public tv) ran programs that were like a civics class. They ran a whole program showing how ordinary citizens could introduce legislation. That of course is no more. That was pre 1960 I think. That date gives a clue re time frame of dumbing down.

It suggests to me that dumbing down was not then fully implemented since info like those PBS shows was still getting out.

Not that it is even yet fully implemented either. They could not get away with it if they did it all in one generation, so to speak.

I recall when all of a sudden all the good ufo books disappeared from the local library. Just one or two dumb ones where left.

Gale
11-28-2009, 06:46 PM
Or how about when the local butcher started hanging up the chart showing where the cuts of beef are on the cow. Or when the cuts of meat in the display didn't look like what they used to look like as in shape or texture of cut; did the butcher forget how to cut up the cow?

Gale
12-11-2009, 06:41 AM
I think there maybe a couple of things to consider.
The BET's have pets or have had pets, human or other ET's. Some individuals in this world's society act and respond just like an abandoned pet that had been totally relying on its owner. That now has to fend for itself.
Years ago there were reports of government catalogue purchases of children's clothing and bulk orders of food being shipped to bases for the ET survivors. There had also been many indicators of an influx of groups of new strangers in areas, one area that comes to mind was Florida. There was even a tent city set up in Orlando, Florida when I lived there from 1978 to 1981.
A hurricane seems like a good cover, I wonder if there are any reports of groups of new comers from the aftermath of Katrina?

There have been many government programs created to help individuals, ranging from food to shelter. Grant it, when times are tough government programs can be very helpful or not. As a single mom I have had to use a few and might still have to even though I am working. So, I am not being discriminatory, just watching behaviors. There is a mentality of some individuals that fully believe that government programs are theirs to rely on, they abuse these programs and know the bureaucracy better than the administrators, to squeeze from these programs for all that they can. This sounds harsh but I have seen it in action.
A human that at some point finds they need one of these government programs, from no fault of their own, can contest that getting set up in one of these programs is a nightmare. Whereas other individuals applying for say, disability, tend to get coverage with far less hassle.

How can that be?

Are government programs set up to help us humans or to satisfy a surrender treaty with the BET's? Just thinking.....

We humans have a natural tendency for self sacrifice, for compassion, a conscious to know right from wrong and survival but not at the expense of an others well being. Whereas, these others show no compassion, no conscious and definitely are not self sacrificing...

:oops: off topic

Norval
12-16-2009, 07:31 AM
There is one thing that all successful scientific career people say about those that aren't.
"Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach. :lol: