PDA

View Full Version : Confessions of a BAD ET?



Heretic
12-02-2008, 02:22 PM
There is a thread over at ATS that has made quite the sensation across the conspiracy websites and forums. Someone came on and created an account and proceeded to a Q&A claiming to be far above the bloodlines of humans.

Claimed to be of those that rule above the human rulers of earth. Yeah I know, sounds crazy but whoever it was knows their material well. I just finished the whole disclosure and it was "interesting" so if you are curious of the BAD ET perspective it is a good read.

Window of Opportunity (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1)

₣яэđĸĊ
12-02-2008, 04:22 PM
Hi heretic;

Yeah, I read thru a good deal of that, back about a month ago. Never could make up my mind about it.

I agree with you in that, "whoever it was knows their material well." Which a part of me has trouble with, considering you then run across very wizened yet extremely circular statements like:

"The 'earth' is indeed ripe for Harvest. The question is, who will be ready? And will the Harvest be Positive, or Negative?"
which begs no more that 15 or 20 questions on it's own.

Motive...
Jeez, motive just begins another tailspin. Bring another bucket full of questions; but then, if they're genuinely who they say, why the question/response approach?

Lemme s'plain that a bit. The situation presents itself as a person of knowledge, who wants to impart information about something unknown to the audience. Ok... move it to a different context for a sec.

Let's say I know how to build a nuclear reactor.
I am going to teach you how to do this, beginning with no other pre-requisit than, you have sufficient intelligence to absorb and retain the subject.

What would be more productive?
A) You sit and ask me questions about how to do this, until you are capable. (Think blind man trying to describe an elephant by touch)
B) You shut uppa yo mouth for about a year whilst I s'plain how it's done, THEN we do questions.

I guess what I'm not seeing here is some monograph of information, so vital to impart they have decided to "jump the tracks" and talk.

Now, is it possible I am just an old fart incapable of wonder? Could be, but I don't think so. I have learned to take pretty good care of my inner wonder, though, and, far as I can tell, it's in pretty good health.

Heretic
12-03-2008, 02:44 AM
Well it is a long read, I spent about an hour or more on it, and I only read "his" posts. I must say it was well done, but on the other hand I could probably pull something like it off, and my "knowledge of the material" would govern what questions I chose to answer, ignoring those I would have to research so I could keep a believable pace.

Oh he had a great excuse to not simply spill the beans:



Every so often, as per the directives of the Law of our Creator, a brief window of opportunity opens, whereby a select handful of our Family are required to make communication with our subjects, and offer you the chance to ask us any questions you would like answered.

I am double-bound in this duty. It is required of me by The Law of our Creator to offer this opportunity to you at this time, though I am also bound by the Law of (planetary) Free Will and by Family Oaths, that there is only so much I am able to say.

Understand, due to the Law of Free Will, I cannot just give you information, at least not without consequences to my own person which I would rather avoid. It is an infringement upon your Free Will, your right to not know. You have to ask me for the information you want, only then can I provide it. So whilst there are important things I have to share, if I am not asked the questions, I cannot get that information to you. I am hopeful that synchronicity will bring the most important questions of real 'depth' out from among you.

My duty is to offer. Yours is to ask. My duty is fulfilled, whether or not yours is.His main contention is that Lucifer is a group soul with many beings as sub-parts (we are legion), here to help Man, having made a deal with Yaweh and the galactic councils by applying the negative sides of free will. By being the "other choice" and how utterly negative it is, allows us humans to understand good and evil enough to evolve towards one or the other for the coming harvest. They strive for as much polarity as possible so there are fewer lukewarm people having to repeat the process over.

Their atrocious acts are explained as their own personal karmic sacrifice so that we may have this "catalyst" as a tool for spiritual development. They claim that they will have to go to the negative 4th density earth to work it all off, and it will be easy because they do not have the blindness we do as they can remember everything they are. They consider this sacrifice their gift to mankind.

So what he is saying is that by applying all these terrible evil things on mankind, we are then motivated to want to be good people out of the revulsion to evil.

Not bad really, and he is very supportive of the heavenly agenda we are looking to and was selling this ideology more than anything negative. And he did go off on some monologues concerning background on answers.

Over all a good read and a compatible ideology to many current and past theologies. Impressive actually, but again it isn't really that new and doesn't take an ET to come up with it. But who knows....

What is weird is I remember reading somewhere (I think "Gods of Eden" ~ Bramley) that many different attempts were made to get man to evolve and that we were slow to catch on. Various different models had been applied on various different versions of "Man".

Kinda gives me the heebie-jeebies.